Figure S4 A. (D and E) Impaired glucose and insulin tolerance in DIO mice were demonstrated through IPGTT and IPITT (n = 10). (F–H) Disturbance in lipid metabolism was indicated by measurements of serum TG, cholesterol, and intra-hepatic TG (n = 5). (I and J) Hepatic damage was reflected by levels of ALT and AST (n = 6). (K–M) Decreased Mof and H4K16ac levels, as well as impaired amino acid, glucose, lipid metabolism, and autophagy, were observed through western blotting (n = 3). GAPDH was the loading control, with quantification in the right panel. (N) Decreased Mof expression in DIO mice were demonstrated through IHC staining. Scale bar: 20 μm. (O) Reduced H4K16ac level in DIO mice were demonstrated through IF staining. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graph data were presented as mean ± SEM. In D–J, n represents the number of mouse. In K–M, n represents the number of western blotting data. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (Student’s t test). " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: iScience
Article Title: Mof plays distinct roles in hepatic lipid metabolism under healthy or non-alcoholic fatty liver conditions
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108446
Figure Lengend Snippet: Mof and H4K16ac expressions were down-regulated in DIO livers (A–C) The livers of WT and DIO mice were subjected to Oil-O, PAS, and HE staining. Scale bar: 100 μm. See also Figure S4 A. (D and E) Impaired glucose and insulin tolerance in DIO mice were demonstrated through IPGTT and IPITT (n = 10). (F–H) Disturbance in lipid metabolism was indicated by measurements of serum TG, cholesterol, and intra-hepatic TG (n = 5). (I and J) Hepatic damage was reflected by levels of ALT and AST (n = 6). (K–M) Decreased Mof and H4K16ac levels, as well as impaired amino acid, glucose, lipid metabolism, and autophagy, were observed through western blotting (n = 3). GAPDH was the loading control, with quantification in the right panel. (N) Decreased Mof expression in DIO mice were demonstrated through IHC staining. Scale bar: 20 μm. (O) Reduced H4K16ac level in DIO mice were demonstrated through IF staining. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graph data were presented as mean ± SEM. In D–J, n represents the number of mouse. In K–M, n represents the number of western blotting data. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (Student’s t test).
Article Snippet: Raw data of some western blotting , This paper , Mendeley Data: https://doi.org/10.17632/d6rztmt6gd.1.
Techniques: Staining, Western Blot, Control, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry